<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac vs PC</title>
	<link>http://www.computersinbusiness.com/technology/mac-vs-pc</link>
	<description>The home of IT @ The Sunday Business Post and Computers in Business magazine on the net</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: ceanna</title>
		<link>http://www.computersinbusiness.com/technology/mac-vs-pc#comment-59</link>
		<author>ceanna</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.computersinbusiness.com/technology/mac-vs-pc#comment-59</guid>
		<description>The answer of course is yes.  The Mac platform is the only one where you can run all operating systems at the same time.  Why one would wish to use Windoze remains one of life's little mysteries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer of course is yes.  The Mac platform is the only one where you can run all operating systems at the same time.  Why one would wish to use Windoze remains one of life&#8217;s little mysteries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cormac</title>
		<link>http://www.computersinbusiness.com/technology/mac-vs-pc#comment-31</link>
		<author>Cormac</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 15:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.computersinbusiness.com/technology/mac-vs-pc#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Yes, it is possible to run OS X on PC.
There are a few clips on &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPqWzwK56qs" rel="nofollow"&gt;youtube&lt;/a&gt;of such instances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is possible to run OS X on PC.<br />
There are a few clips on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPqWzwK56qs" rel="nofollow">youtube</a>of such instances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://www.computersinbusiness.com/technology/mac-vs-pc#comment-29</link>
		<author>Michele</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.computersinbusiness.com/technology/mac-vs-pc#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Cormac - Ignoring the licensing, isn't it possible technically?

Michele</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cormac - Ignoring the licensing, isn&#8217;t it possible technically?</p>
<p>Michele</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cormac</title>
		<link>http://www.computersinbusiness.com/technology/mac-vs-pc#comment-27</link>
		<author>Cormac</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.computersinbusiness.com/technology/mac-vs-pc#comment-27</guid>
		<description>There is a licensing issue at the moment between MS and Apple which 'prevents' Macs being installed on PCs.

Apple are certainly pushing the dual functionality of Macs. Boot Camp is be a default feature of Leopard and according to Jobs' Keynote speech, you can boot straight from Leopard into XP in approx 5 seconds. Handy out!

And of course &lt;a href="http://www.parallels.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Parallels&lt;/a&gt; is the sweet-heart of dual functionality between the two systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a licensing issue at the moment between MS and Apple which &#8216;prevents&#8217; Macs being installed on PCs.</p>
<p>Apple are certainly pushing the dual functionality of Macs. Boot Camp is be a default feature of Leopard and according to Jobs&#8217; Keynote speech, you can boot straight from Leopard into XP in approx 5 seconds. Handy out!</p>
<p>And of course <a href="http://www.parallels.com" rel="nofollow">Parallels</a> is the sweet-heart of dual functionality between the two systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.computersinbusiness.com/technology/mac-vs-pc#comment-26</link>
		<author>Mark</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.computersinbusiness.com/technology/mac-vs-pc#comment-26</guid>
		<description>PS the Hoff rocks!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS the Hoff rocks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.computersinbusiness.com/technology/mac-vs-pc#comment-25</link>
		<author>Mark</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.computersinbusiness.com/technology/mac-vs-pc#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Have you tried Ubuntu on a Mac Ken? I haven't myself but curious, I've read reports that Win XP runs faster on a Mac than a PC - was I dreaming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried Ubuntu on a Mac Ken? I haven&#8217;t myself but curious, I&#8217;ve read reports that Win XP runs faster on a Mac than a PC - was I dreaming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.computersinbusiness.com/technology/mac-vs-pc#comment-24</link>
		<author>Ken</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.computersinbusiness.com/technology/mac-vs-pc#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I'm sorry but Ubuntu on an old Dell Inspiron is the future ;o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry but Ubuntu on an old Dell Inspiron is the future ;o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://www.computersinbusiness.com/technology/mac-vs-pc#comment-23</link>
		<author>Michele</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.computersinbusiness.com/technology/mac-vs-pc#comment-23</guid>
		<description>As far as I know you can run OSX on a PC, but you need to do some hacking to get it working.

I'm sure one of the more technical types would be able to give more detail

Michele</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know you can run OSX on a PC, but you need to do some hacking to get it working.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure one of the more technical types would be able to give more detail</p>
<p>Michele</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
